Abstract

In response to recent challenges to modernization theory, this research models variables suggested by three major theories that provide explanations of income distribution across nations: Modernization theory, dependency/world-systems theory, and ecological-evolutionary theory. A base modernization model containing energy consumption per capita, adult literacy, and secondary school enrollment ratios (all circa 1965/1970) is tested against alternative specifications that include the social organization of rural areas, political democracy, export dependency, land inequality, and foreign capital penetration. Strongest support is found for modernization and ecological-evolutionary theories, while the patterns of support for political redistribution and dependency/world-systems theory are more mixed. We conclude that singular claims of theoretical dominance are unwarranted and should be replaced by emphasis on how theories provide complimentary explanations.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.