The disparity of measuring bone mineral content using bioimpedance and dual-energy absorptiometry in the context of hyperparathyroidism.

Abstract

Introduction:Body composition is critical for the evaluation of patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and can be obtained from either multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) or dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA). Although the discrepancy between the results obtained from both methods has already been described, reasons are unknown, and might be related to secondary hyperparathyroidism, which is associated with bone loss.Methods:We have evaluated 49 patients (25 males and 24 females): 20 with CKD not on dialysis and 29 on maintenance hemodialysis [18 with severe hyperparathyroidism (HD-SHPT) and 11 submitted to parathyroidectomy (HD-PTX)]. All patients underwent DXA and BIA.Results:The median age and body mass index (BMI) were 49 years and 25.6 kg/m2, respectively. Patients exhibited low bone mineral content (BMC) measured by DXA, particularly those from the HD-SHPT group. The largest BMC measurement disagreement between DXA and BIA was found in the HD-SHPT group (p=0.004). Factors independently associated with this discrepancy in BMC measurement were serum phosphate (p=0.003) and patient group (p=0.027), even after adjustments for age, BMI, and gender (adjusted r2=0.186). PTX attenuated this difference.Discussion:BIA should be interpreted with caution in patients with SHPT due to a loss of accuracy, which can compromise the interpretation of body composition.