Abstract
L .A. DELVOIE'S REVIEW OF MY BOOK, The Diplomacy of Prudence: Canada and Israel, 1948-1958 (winter 1997-8) raises several serious questions. My major concern relates to the reviewers lack of forbearance in giving comprehensive observations to the substantive Canadian and Israeli primary archival sources which resulted in the textual conclusions. For example, the chapter on 'The Sage of the Unsheathed Sabres' painstakingly presented both the Canadian and Israeli perspectives, clearly delineating the attitudes and policy decisions of both sides. His assessment 'written entirely from an Israeli perspective ... judged almost entirely in terms ... of addressing Israeli interests and purposes' brings into question the reviewers objectivity and competence. I am also troubled by the reviewer s plaint that in my book I failed to account for the possibility that 'the Canadian government might formulate its policies ... on its own assessments ... or its own appreciation of events.' This type of criticism raises the question again of the depth of the reviewers perusal of the text and conveys a disregard for the constituent elements of diplomacy and the political process. One has to countenance what happened and not what should have happened or what one would have liked to have transpired. Predilection should not compromise objectivity when writing or even reviewing a book.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.