The Differentiation and Self-institutionalization of Social Subsystems: The Theoretical Intent of the Social Connection Model of Responsibility

Abstract

This paper responds to a critique of Iris Youngs social connection model of responsibility in addressing global justice issues. The critique argues that the model overlooks the significant impact of state domination in injustices worldwide and that institutional development at the national and international levels is the core approach to achieving global justice. The paper contends that the models emphasis on the importance of civil society organizations and its downplaying of state domination and institutional establishment results from Youngs awareness of the current social reality of social subsystem differentiation and the crucial role of self-institutionalization in addressing structural injustice. The paper argues that the theoretical purpose of the social connection model of responsibility is to reveal that the differentiation and self-institutionalization of social subsystems are both the causes of violations of individuals fundamental rights and a resolution to structural injustice.