Abstract
When we speak, we often use nonliteral utterances in which the meaning intended is different from the literal meaning. So, we must be able to differentiate what the speaker says from what he wants to say, using contextual information to understand the speaker's intention and to make assumptions, predictions and inferences.The aim of this study is to determine whether there exists a hierarchy of complexity between various nonliteral speech acts. In other words, does an indirect request, for instance, require more processing to be understood than an ironic statement ? Some evidence was found for the existence of a hierarchy of complexity. Results emphasizes the particular role of conventionality and confirm the idea that conversational rules are very strongly dependent upon context.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
