Abstract

Understanding the processes shaping biological communities under interacting disturbances is a core challenge in ecology. Although the impacts of human‐induced disturbances on forest ecosystems have been extensively studied, less attention has been paid to understanding how tree regeneration at the community level responds to such disturbances. Moreover, these previous studies have not considered how these effects change according to major social and environmental factors that can influence forest use at a landscape scale. In this study, we investigate the effects of cattle grazing and selective logging on the composition of tree regeneration communities in relation to forest successional stage and land tenure regime in Chilean temperate forests, a global biodiversity hotspot. We recorded seedlings, saplings and basal area of stumps of tree species (as a surrogate for selective logging), and number of cattle dung pats (as a surrogate for cattle pressure) in 129 25 × 20 m plots in small (<200 ha) and large properties in different successional stages (old‐growth, intermediate, secondary forests). The regeneration of the ten more abundant species as predicted by human disturbance, land tenure, forest successional stage, and number of parent trees was modelled using generalised linear models. Predictions for each individual model were made under different scenarios of human disturbance. The predicted regeneration results were assembled and subjected to ordination analyses and permutation multivariate analyses of variance to determine differences in regeneration composition under each scenario. In most cases, best‐fit models contained at least one of the explanatory variables accounting for human disturbance. The effects of selective logging on tree regeneration varied depending on land tenure regime, but cattle grazing always exhibited a negative effect. Our results revealed that cattle have a more negative effect on forest regeneration than selective logging, especially in old‐growth forests and small properties. Our analytical approach contributes to the understanding of the differential influence of human‐induced disturbances on the tree regeneration community at a landscape scale. It can inform conservation policies and actions, which should focus on addressing the main disturbance factors and on developing strategies to conserve the most sensitive species to such disturbances.

Highlights

  • The impacts of human-induced disturbances on forest ecosystems have been extensively reported throughout the world (Belsky and Blumenthal 1997, Augustine and McNaughton 1998, Wisdom et al 2006, Baraloto et al 2012, Clark and Covey 2012)

  • Our study reveals that cattle grazing and selective logging have contrasting effects on the regeneration of different tree species, which shapes the composition of future communities

  • These effects were conditioned by land tenure regime and forest successional stages

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The impacts of human-induced disturbances on forest ecosystems have been extensively reported throughout the world (Belsky and Blumenthal 1997, Augustine and McNaughton 1998, Wisdom et al 2006, Baraloto et al 2012, Clark and Covey 2012). Forest degradation by both intense, episodic disturbances (e.g., extensive logging or forest conversion to other land uses) and low intensity, chronic disturbances (e.g., grazing, selective logging or invasion of exotic species and fires) have been studied in several forests (Belsky and Blumenthal 1997, Ramırez-Marcial et al 2001, Stern et al 2002, Timmins 2002, Fisher et al 2009, Baraloto et al 2012, Clark and Covey 2012) These disturbances, cattle grazing and selective logging, change species diversity and composition, which may have a major influence on community and ecosystem functioning (Chapin et al 1998, Cadotte et al 2011, Baraloto et al 2012). Turner (2010) identified as research priorities the study of disturbances as catalysts of rapid ecological change, interactions among disturbances and relationships between land use and disturbance

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.