Abstract
Aim: Antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus renders treatment poorly effective. Despite erm(41)-gene-mediated macrolide resistance, treatment with azithromycin or clarithromycin is recommended. It is contested whether macrolides differ in erm(41) induction. We determine whether this is the case. Methods: M. abscessus CIP104536 was used. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of clarithromycin and azithromycin were determined. Time-kill kinetics of M. abscessus exposed to azithromycin or clarithromycin were performed and RNA was isolated at predetermined intervals for erm(41) quantification. Results: Minimum inhibitory concentrations increased >30-fold. Time-kill kinetics showed a temporary bacteriostatic effect, abrogated by induced resistance. Erm(41) expression was increased following exposure to either macrolide for 7days. Conclusion: Both macrolides induce resistance similarly, and this should not be an argument in choosing either macrolide for therapy.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
