Abstract
This study investigates the relative importance of accrual-based earnings management (AEM) and real earnings management (REM) as reflected in audit fees. Auditors charge not only for AEM, but also for REM, because it increases the litigation risks and audit complexity they face by dampening firms’ long-term fundamentals; however, whether auditors charge more for AEM or for REM is relatively unexplored. Using data from 24 countries, we find that auditors, on average, charge a higher premium for REM than for AEM. We also find that a strong legal regime increases the audit fee premium charged on both AEM and REM, where the premium for REM increases to a greater extent than it does for AEM. Overall, our results provide novel evidence of the relative importance of the different types of earnings management under different legal regimes to auditors.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
