The Diagnostic Yield of Electromyography at Detecting Abnormalities on Muscle Biopsy: A Single Center Experience

Abstract

ABSTRACT Historically, electromyography (EMG) is utilized early in the diagnostic evaluation of neuromuscular disorders, but its importance may be diminishing with more sophisticated genetic, imaging and immunohistochemistry investigations now available. In the present study, the diagnostic yield of EMG at predicting pathological abnormalities confirmed by muscle biopsy was determined at our neuroscience center. A retrospective study of consecutive cases reviewed at neuromuscular multidisciplinary meetings between 2007 and 2016 identified patients who had EMG and muscle biopsy as part of their diagnostic evaluation. EMG and biopsy findings were categorized as myopathic, neurogenic or normal. The diagnostic accuracy was determined by calculating the concordance between EMG and pathological findings. Of the 175 cases included in the analysis, there was definite concordance between EMG and muscle biopsy findings in 134 cases (76.6%). Abnormal EMG produced sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 65% for abnormal muscle biopsy. Seventeen patients had a normal EMG and an abnormal muscle biopsy, of which 6 had histopathological findings consistent with mitochondrial myopathy, central core myopathy or glycogen storage disorder. Conflicting EMG and muscle biopsy findings were observed in 10 cases. Inclusion body myositis, chronic neuromuscular disorders and dual pathologies were associated with discordant findings. This study demonstrates that EMG has accurate predictive value in diagnosing neuromuscular disorders at our neuroscience center. EMG retains a vital role, particularly in initial diagnostic evaluations of neuromuscular disorders.