Abstract

Simple SummaryDistinguishing cancer in the head of the pancreas, distal bile duct cancer, and benign periampullary conditions, is complex due to often overlapping symptoms. Accurate diagnosis is important for early treatment initiation and improvement of patient prognoses. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic potential of the ratio of CA19-9 with bilirubin in patients with cancer of the pancreatic head, distal bile duct cancer and benign diseases of the periampullary region prior to treatment. We confirmed in a population of 232 patients with hepatopancreaticobiliary disease in the periampullary region, that the ratio of CA19-9 and bilirubin showed higher diagnostic power than analysis of CA19-9 and bilirubin levels alone and therefore could be useful to aid early diagnosis and improve treatment of patients in the future.Distinction of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the head of the pancreas, distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA), and benign periampullary conditions, is complex as they often share similar clinical symptoms. However, these diseases require specific management strategies, urging improvement of non-invasive tools for accurate diagnosis. Recent evidence has shown that the ratio between CA19-9 and bilirubin levels supports diagnostic distinction of benign or malignant hepatopancreaticobiliary diseases. Here, we investigate the diagnostic value of this ratio in PDAC, dCCA and benign diseases of the periampullary region in a novel fashion. To address this aim, we enrolled 265 patients with hepatopancreaticobiliary diseases and constructed four logistic regression models on a subset of patients (n = 232) based on CA19-9, bilirubin and the ratio of both values: CA19-9/(bilirubin−1). Non-linearity was investigated using restricted cubic splines and a final model, the ‘Model Ratio’, based on these three variables was fitted using multivariable fractional polynomials. The performance of this model was consistently superior in terms of discrimination and calibration compared to models based on CA19-9 combined with bilirubin and CA19-9 or bilirubin alone. The ‘Model Ratio’ accurately distinguished between malignant and benign disease (AUC [95% CI], 0.91 [0.86–0.95]), PDAC and benign disease (AUC 0.91 [0.87–0.96]) and PDAC and dCCA (AUC 0.83 [0.74–0.92]) which was confirmed by internal validation using 1000 bootstrap replicates. These findings provide a foundation to improve minimally-invasive diagnostic procedures, ultimately ameliorating effective therapy for PDAC and dCCA.

Highlights

  • Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common malignancy that originates in the pancreas with an aggressive character and a dismal 5-year survival rate of 10.8% [1–3]

  • PDAC located in the pancreatic head often has similar nonspecific clinical symptoms, histological features and lesions that are indistinguishable on imaging to distal cholangiocarcinoma, which makes it problematic to discriminate between these two tumour types [5]

  • This study demonstrates that the diagnostic value of the carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and bilirubin ratio is relevant to cholangiocarcinomas, which has not been described in research efforts before

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common malignancy that originates in the pancreas with an aggressive character and a dismal 5-year survival rate of 10.8% [1–3]. PDAC located in the pancreatic head often has similar nonspecific clinical symptoms, histological features and lesions that are indistinguishable on imaging to distal cholangiocarcinoma, which makes it problematic to discriminate between these two tumour types [5]. Distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) originates from the distal bile duct and has a slightly better, though still poor, prognosis [6]. Is it complex to differentiate between these tumour types, and distinguishing these tumours from benign conditions can be difficult, due to a similarity in clinical presentation, as benign conditions can be characterized by weight loss and jaundice [7]. The difference in therapeutic approach of PDAC and dCCA, plus the importance of preventing unnecessary surgery in the case of benign disease, underlines the necessity of correct pre-treatment diagnosis

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.