Abstract

BackgroundCornell assessment of pediatric delirium (CAPD) showed advantage in diagnosis of pediatric delirium in Chinese critically ill patients. But its performance in surgical patients is still unclear. The present study was designed to validate the diagnostic performance of CAPD in surgical pediatric patients.MethodsThis is a prospective validation study. Pediatric patients who underwent selective surgery and general anesthesia were enrolled. Primary outcome was the incidence of delirium within postoperative three days. CAPD Chinese version was used to evaluate if the patient had delirium one time per day. At the meantime, a psychiatrist employed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fifth edition to diagnose delirium, which was the “gold standard”, and the result was considered as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated to investigate the performance of CAPD.ResultsA total of 170 patients were enrolled. Median age was 4 years old. As diagnosed by psychiatrist, 23 (13.5 %) patients experienced at least one episode of delirium during the follow-up period. When diagnostic threshold was set at 9, CAPD showed the optimal sensitivity (87.0 %, 95 %CI 65.3 %-96.6 %) and specificity (98.0 %, 95 %CI 93.7 %-99.5 %) in comparison with other diagnostic thresholds. ROC analysis showed that CAPD was a good delirium assessment instrument with area under curve of 0.911 (95 % CI 0.812 to 1.000, P < 0.001). Agreement between CAPD and reference standard was 0.849 (Kappa coefficient, P < 0.001).ConclusionsThis study found that Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium could be used as an effective instrument in diagnosis of delirium in pediatric surgical patients.Trial registrationwww.chictr.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR-DDD-17,012,231, August 3, 2017.

Highlights

  • Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium (CAPD) showed advantage in diagnosis of pediatric delirium in Chinese critically ill patients

  • CAPD has two advantages in comparison with other instruments. It can be used in children of all ages. pCAM-intensive care unit (ICU) is applicable to the evaluation of children aged 5 years or above while pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) is applicable to patients aged from 19 months to 6 years [1, 3]

  • The accuracy and efficacy of CAPD Chinese version have been validated in pediatric patients in intensive care unit (ICU) [9]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium (CAPD) showed advantage in diagnosis of pediatric delirium in Chinese critically ill patients. The present study was designed to validate the diagnostic performance of CAPD in surgical pediatric patients. Several brief instruments had been developed including pediatric confusion assessment method for intensive care unit (pCAM-ICU), pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED), and Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium (CAPD) [1,2,3, 8]. CAPD has two advantages in comparison with other instruments It can be used in children of all ages. The accuracy and efficacy of CAPD Chinese version have been validated in pediatric patients in intensive care unit (ICU) [9].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.