Abstract

To see whether the related mistake patterns can be linked to a particular set of variables, a Eight Control equipment recognizing (and six forcedalignment) algorithms were evaluated for clinical diagnosis. Each recognizing service's result was converted to a standardized way and evaluated to a comparative record made from pronunciations labelled data (which included 54 minutes of information from several hundred speakers). A job evaluation was used to relate a combination of acoustic, morphological, etc. speaker attributes to acknowledgment occurrences throughout this reference data. The decision trees show that correct categorization of phonetic segments and characteristics is one of the most constant variables linked with better recognition performance. These findings indicate that enhancing the pronouncing modelling used in verbal pairing, including the acoustic modeling techniques utilized for morphological classification, might improve future-generation recognition systems.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.