Abstract

Sections 78 and 79 of the Education Act 1964 create the religious instruction whereby otherwise secular state primary schools can close to allow for religious instruction and observances. Despite perpetual controversy, the scheme has remained untouched for 57 years. With Hines v AG awaiting its hearing in the High Court, this hands-off approach is no longer sustainable. This essay examines the history of the opt-out scheme and its present incoherencies, uncovering a scheme which is deeply informed by the societal context and competing interests under which it operates. Changes to state education in past decades have resulted in the opt-out scheme allowing more than simply bible-in-schools into classrooms. The scheme has become a gateway for aspects of tikanga Māori where the line between the spiritual and the cultural is not clear cut. Thus, in a reform debate publicly and politically saturated by the religious–secular divide, in reality the greatest threat exists in relation to Māori. This article concludes that while the opt-out scheme's incoherence means reform is necessary, simply replacing the scheme would fundamentally threaten the position of tikanga Māori in schools. In this way, reform can only be done in full partnership with Māori as a key stakeholder.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.