The Devil is in the (Bio)diversity: Private Sector “Engagement” and the Restructuring of Biodiversity Conservation
Intensified relations between biodiversity conservation organizations and privatesector actors are analyzed through a historical perspective that positions biodiversity conservation as an organized political project. Within this view the organizational dimensions of conservation exist as coordinated agreement and action among a variety of actors that take shape within radically asymmetrical power relations. This paper traces the privileged position of “business” in aligning concepts of sustainable development and ecological modernization within the emerging institutional context of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Global Environment Facility in ways that help to secure continued access to “nature as capital”, and create the institutional conditions to shape the work of conservation organizations. The contemporary emergence of business as a major actor in shaping contemporary biodiversity conservation is explained in part by the organizational characteristics of modernist conservation that subordinates it to larger societal and political projects such as neoliberal capitalism.
250
- 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90051-5
- Jan 1, 1992
- Geoforum
27
- 10.1163/1571807024396476
- Jan 1, 2002
- Non-State Actors and International Law
596
- 10.1080/09644010008414511
- Mar 1, 2000
- Environmental Politics
45
- 10.1080/135498303200041313
- Jan 1, 2003
- Local Environment
86
- 10.1080/09557570008400329
- Sep 1, 2000
- Cambridge Review of International Affairs
52
- 10.1177/0002764202045009007
- May 1, 2002
- American Behavioral Scientist
2
- 10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540070
- Jan 1, 2002
- Journal of Brand Management
745
- 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00470.x
- May 1, 2005
- International Affairs
501
- 10.1080/08941929809381069
- Mar 1, 1998
- Society & Natural Resources
110
- 10.1162/1526380054794916
- Aug 1, 2005
- Global Environmental Politics
- Research Article
4
- 10.1177/194277861300600309
- Nov 1, 2013
- Human Geography
We seek to understand the contemporary adaptive co-management framework of natural/forest resource conservation. To do this we trace the genealogy of adaptive co-management and its call for the “democratic participation” of “all stakeholders”. We show how this inserted commercial agents as stakeholders, thus providing contemporary neoliberal accumulation regimes with a problem-solving framework for natural/forest conservation shaped by, and amenable to, their characteristic managerial discourse of “flexibility”, “innovation”, “voluntary self-regulation”, “incentivization”, “partnership”, “network(ing)”, “social learning” and “local knowledge”.
- Research Article
16
- 10.1068/a45294
- Jan 1, 2013
- Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
The past quarter century has witnessed a ‘quieter revolution’ in land-use management in the United States, from top-down regulation and adversarial environmentalism to multistakeholder collaboration and voluntary market-based mechanisms designed to forge a compromise between nature protection, property rights, and local livelihoods. The latter approach has become hegemonic, and yet this dramatic shift has received little attention from political ecologists. In this paper I argue that two contradictory lessons on the topic can be drawn from political ecology. On the one hand, proponents of the ‘quieter revolution’ invoke themes and normative stances shared by political ecologists, celebrating self-management by place-based communities drawing on local knowledge, in opposition to control by central governments and powerful environmental groups wielding ‘big science’. On the other hand, the ‘quieter revolution’ exemplifies the neoliberalization of nature, which political ecologists have critiqued as providing a ‘stamp of environmental approval’ for capitalist expansion, often at the expense of the nature values it claims to defend. Thus, the ‘quieter revolution’ exposes tensions in the application of the Third-World-based political ecology orientation to a First World setting. I explore these tensions through a case study of voluntary and collaborative approaches (specifically, transfer of development rights and habitat conservation planning) in exurban Collier County in southwest Florida. I argue that in this context, it is more useful to focus on the neoliberalization of nature than on the valorization of local knowledge and control, because the discourse of local knowledge and livelihoods aligns with the (anti-environmental) interests of locally powerful actors. These power relations—and the limits of deeply embedded assumptions that undergird the political ecology literature—are revealed most effectively through ethnographic examination of the micropolitics of particular cases.
- Research Article
21
- 10.1017/s204710251300054x
- Oct 23, 2013
- Transnational Environmental Law
Abstract There is no hope for international environmental law to be an engine for global social change when it can no longer provide a compelling account of itself. This article presents a theoretical framework, constructed from the works of Michel Foucault, capable of tracing this loss of descriptive capacity, as well as the resultant prescriptive confusion. The analysis examines the challenges posed by the triptych of biodiversity, biotechnology and neoliberalism housed under the idea of genetic gold, and calls for attention to micro-politics, in the shape of the apparatuses for the production of environmental subjectivity that operate outside the formal structures of the international legal sphere. The trope of genetic gold is revealed as an obsolete attempt to protect a fixed idea of biodiversity based on an outdated conception of environmental value. In response, the author argues for a mature confrontation with the end(s) of international environmental law.
- Research Article
162
- 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00762.x
- May 21, 2010
- Antipode
Abstract: Intensified relations between biodiversity conservation organizations and private‐sector actors are analyzed through a historical perspective that positions biodiversity conservation as an organized political project. Within this view the organizational dimensions of conservation exist as coordinated agreement and action among a variety of actors that take shape within radically asymmetrical power relations. This paper traces the privileged position of “business” in aligning concepts of sustainable development and ecological modernization within the emerging institutional context of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Global Environment Facility in ways that help to secure continued access to “nature as capital”, and create the institutional conditions to shape the work of conservation organizations. The contemporary emergence of business as a major actor in shaping contemporary biodiversity conservation is explained in part by the organizational characteristics of modernist conservation that subordinates it to larger societal and political projects such as neoliberal capitalism.
- Research Article
- 10.15835/nbha3814699
- Jun 15, 2010
- Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca
Funding biodiversity protection in Central and Eastern Europe – a case study of Bosnia Herzegovina
- Research Article
4
- 10.1162/glep_a_00405
- May 1, 2017
- Global Environmental Politics
Beyond Biodiversity Conservation: Why Policy Needs Social Theory, Social Theory Needs Justice, and Justice Needs Policy
- Research Article
45
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01717.x
- Feb 1, 2003
- Conservation Biology
The Devil in the Detail of Biodiversity Conservation
- Research Article
1
- 10.1002/inc3.14
- Dec 1, 2022
- Integrative Conservation
<i>Integrative Conservation</i>: A new journal from the conservation frontline
- Research Article
13
- 10.1007/bf00051964
- Dec 1, 1993
- Biodiversity and Conservation
The last five years in particular have seen increasing attention paid to biodiversity. This culminated at the Earth Summit last June with the completion of Agenda 21 and a major international Convention on Biological Diversity, a document signed by some 165 nations. Concurrent with the Convention negotiations was the development of a global fund for biodiversity conservation and other environmental priorities, the Global Environment Facility (GEF). The GEF is the largest fund to data put forward by the international community to address biodiversity loss, but, so far, it has failed to set adequate priorities for biodiversity conservation. It has also yet to recognize the full range of biodiversity values and uses and, in general, GEF projects have not taken advantage of existing non-governmental capacity for biodiversity conservation. 1993 is a critical year for the GEF, one in which the GEF can become a critical element of global efforts to conserve biodiversity or remain an important initialive that realized only a fraction of its potential.
- Dissertation
- 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/396
- Jan 1, 2017
Consideration of the ‘social dimensions’ is increasingly gaining currency within the conservation community. A growing body of literature indicates the importance and influence people and societal practices have on the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation. As such, conservationists and their organisations are being urged to embed more social components within their projects and programmes. However, there is self-reported lack of understanding, skills and confidence by many conservationists about the scope and nature of this social dimension within the biodiversity conservation context. This thesis aims to recast the social dimensions of conservation. Specifically, to explore its boundaries and how current understanding can be supplemented using a social practice theoretical lens. It aims to strengthen conceptual understanding and develop pathways of practical application within conservation organisations. This research was undertaken within the context of my own institution, the Zoological Society of London which is a UK zoo-based conservation organisation. The research was exploratory in nature due to the complexity and relatively undefined status of the social dimensions within biodiversity conservation. A mixed method approach was employed using key informant interviews and an online survey instrument to depict and describe practices within the social dimensions of conservation, and to gather perceptions about these practices. The thematic results offer both a recasting of the definition of the social dimensions of conservation and a conceptual model of the ‘ecologies of practices’ at the Zoological Society of London. These new knowledge resources provide a basis to foster further understanding of how people and their practices fit into the conservation landscape. They also offer recommendations for both the Zoological Society of London and the wider biodiversity conservation community, to build individual and organisational capacity towards the social dimensions through future research, training and organisational development.
- Research Article
9
- 10.5075/epfl-thesis-4400
- Jan 1, 2009
Stratégies villageoises pour la gestion des paysages forestiers du Menabe Central, Madagascar
- Dissertation
2
- 10.25501/soas.00029012
- Jan 1, 2000
This thesis is concerned with the accountability of public international financial institutions to their constituencies at global and local geographic scales. It investigates the compliance of the World Bank and the Global Environment Facility (GEF) with their own environmental and social policies as they relate to biodiversity protection. While the World Bank and the GEF pursue a global environmental agenda, their environmental and social policies commit the institutions to building bridges between the global and the local levels by requiring the participation of locally affected communities in decision-making. The study investigates the compliance with the policies in a specific geographic, political and economic space. Cameroon was chosen because both institutions consider the country's biodiversity to be of global significance and are financing operations which have indirect and direct impacts on its biodiversity. The operations investigated include World Bank macro-economic policy advice and traditional investments in infrastructure projects as well as a GEF project specifically designed to protect biodiversity. The central finding of this research is that the institutions comply only partially and in an uneven manner with their own mandatory policy guidelines. In order to mitigate the risk of studying the institutions' operations in only one country and to ascertain possible systemic patterns of institutional behaviour, the results of the case studies are contrasted with the institutions internal evaluation reports covering their overall portfolios. A political ecology approach to international financial institutions is used to examine the political factors behind the emergence of the institutions' biodiversity agenda and the implementation of their operational policies. Analytical tools from both political science and the areas of sociology and economics concerned with theory of organization are employed to further the understanding of the functioning of the global institutions. Finally, the thesis seeks to contribute to defining the characteristics of global institutions which can mediate between the global and local levels by creating spaces of negotiation in which a plurality of views are taken into account.
- Research Article
25
- 10.1017/s0376892916000187
- Jun 24, 2016
- Environmental Conservation
SUMMARYReducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) has emerged as a potentially important component of the global policy mix to mitigate climate change. Against a background of increasing engagement between private sector entities and conservation organizations, private sector investment has emerged in REDD+. Despite slow developments at the international scale, there continues to be private sector interest in REDD+ and continued voluntary investments in REDD+ projects and initiatives. In order to better understand possible models for private sector engagement in REDD+, this study analysed the motivation of private sector stakeholders to engage in REDD+, the perception of the potential of REDD+, the critical obstacles to making REDD+ functional and how actors perceive themselves as part of future REDD+ scenarios. Based on interviews and a workshop with private sector actors, this study found that few expect a regulatory market for REDD+ to emerge and that credits from the voluntary market have to be tailored to specific needs. As a carbon offset, REDD+ provides insufficient motivation for investment, particularly if cheaper alternatives exist. Co-benefits such as biodiversity conservation and community development are more important when traditional corporate social responsibility motivations play a role. Project scale remains important not only for the fact that smaller projects are viewed as offering more visible benefits to stakeholders but also as a means of having more control over risks on the ground, posing a challenge for the design of jurisdictional REDD+. Moving towards supply chains that are free from deforestation offers an opportunity to tackle commodity-driven deforestation. While questions remain about how such an approach might be integrated into REDD+, it could help address a perceived gap between private sector understanding of the values of REDD+ and the risks associated with these values not arising – termed here as a ‘missing middle’.
- Research Article
140
- 10.1016/j.tree.2006.04.005
- May 5, 2006
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Protected areas: a prism for a changing world
- Book Chapter
- 10.1163/9789004217188_027
- Jan 1, 2015
This chapter discusses the role of the financial mechanism under the Protocol, and the role of other forms of financial solidarity, in turn. The international governance of the financial mechanism under the Nagoya Protocol includes a key role not only for the Protocol's governing body, but also for the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Conference of the Parties (COP). In voluntarily providing financial resources through other channels, developed countries are to take into account the needs of developing countries, as identified in their capacity need self-assessments, and may choose between bilateral, regional and multilateral channels. Intergovernmental discussions preparing for the entry into force of the Protocol have already identified the need to take a strategic approach to maximize opportunities for financial support as a complement to the Global Environment Facility (GEF). Governments, organizations, private sector and financial institutions are encouraged to provide financial resources for the implementation of the Protocol.Keywords: Conference of the Parties (COP); Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD); financial mechanism; financial resources; Global Environment Facility (GEF); Nagoya Protocol
- Research Article
- 10.29243/medkon.22.2.156-163
- Jan 1, 2017
Biodiversity conservation in national parks has not shown an expected result. Biological natural resources degradation is still on going and its almost entirely due to human activities. Some researchers have indicated that socio-economic aspect is significantly related with the success of conservation. However, the researches have not yet shown in detail, which variabels were related with the succes conservation variables and how significant were the relations. This research was intended to identify the socio-economic variable(s) that would successfully determine biodiversity conservation in national park. The research was conducted in Gunung Halimun Salak Nasional Park, Ujung Kulon National Park, and Gunung Ciremai National Park from July to October 2015 using direct observation, literature study, and interview methods involving 150 respondents, selected based on random sampling in several resorts in the three national parks. Data were analyzed using pearson correlation tests using SPSS PSAW statistic 18. The achievement of biodiversity conservation was determined by the decrease in the number of individual species, increase in the rate of encroachment, increase of illegal natural resource utilization, increase violation of regulation, positive interaction, and biodiversity utilization. Results showed that variables leading to the succesful biodiversity conservation were: 1) determinant variable to decrease in the number of species is religion & customary system; 2) determinant variables to increase in encroachment rate is age and distance; 3) determinant variable to increase illegal natural resource utilization is land ownership; 4) determinant variable to increase violation of regulation is family dependant; 5) determinant variables to positive interaction is age and distance; 6) determinant variable to biodiversity utilization is education. Keywords: biodiversity conservation, determinant variables, national park, socio-economic variables
- Research Article
25
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.014
- Nov 1, 2021
- One Earth
Integrated spatial planning for biodiversity conservation and food production
- Research Article
2
- 10.15421/2020_135
- Aug 16, 2020
- Ukrainian Journal of Ecology
Ecological impact of phytoinvasions in Ukraine
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.