Abstract

States have the obligation to protect and preserve the marine environment under Article 192 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), however, the wording in Article 192 of UNCLOS is too general to apply in practice. For a quarter of a century since UNCLOS entered into forth in 1994, the marine environmental protection obligation has been interpreted and developed by international courts and tribunals, especially by the South China Sea (SCS) Arbitration. This paper first analyzes the developments of marine environmental protection obligation made by the SCS Arbitration in submission 11 and 12B. Then the paper aims to demonstrate that, even though China repeated its non-compliance policy towards the SCS Arbitration, the developments of marine environmental protection obligation made by the SCS Tribunal still had significant operational impact in China's marine policy, especially in China's SCS fisheries policy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.