Abstract

In this study, we investigate the development of primary memory capacity among children. Children between the ages of 5 and 8 completed 3 novel tasks (split span, interleaved lists, and a modified free-recall task) that measured primary memory by estimating the number of items in the focus of attention that could be spontaneously recalled in serial order. These tasks were calibrated against traditional measures of simple and complex span. Clear age-related changes in these primary memory estimates were observed. There were marked individual differences in primary memory capacity, but each novel measure was predictive of simple span performance. Among older children, each measure shared variance with reading and mathematics performance, whereas for younger children, the interleaved lists task was the strongest single predictor of academic ability. We argue that these novel tasks have considerable potential for the measurement of primary memory capacity and provide new, complementary ways of measuring the transient memory processes that predict academic performance. The interleaved lists task also shared features with interference control tasks, and our findings suggest that young children have a particular difficulty in resisting distraction and that variance in the ability to resist distraction is also shared with measures of educational attainment.

Highlights

  • IntroductionWe investigate the development of primary memory capacity among children

  • In this study, we investigate the development of primary memory capacity among children

  • Attempts to fragment working memory tasks into their component parts have shown that processing speed is a predictor of classroom behavior (Jarrold, Mackett, & Hall, 2014), while immediate storage capacity predicts unique variance in reading ability (Bayliss et al, 2003) and mathematics (Bull et al, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We investigate the development of primary memory capacity among children. Executive control in particular has received a great deal of attention, as working memory tasks are typically more predictive of academic performance than are measures of immediate storage or speed of processing (Bayliss et al, 2003; Swanson, 1994; Swanson & Alloway, 2012). Attempts to fragment working memory tasks into their component parts have shown that processing speed is a predictor of classroom behavior (Jarrold, Mackett, & Hall, 2014), while immediate storage capacity predicts unique variance in reading ability (Bayliss et al, 2003) and mathematics (Bull et al, 2008). Immediate memory capacity undoubtedly plays a role in successful use of working memory for this purpose, and valid measures of this construct must be used to clarify the nature of any suggested relationship between academic performance and working memory

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call