Abstract
The main approaches for development of assessment technology of higher education institution’s administrative personnel are considered in this article. Alongside with it the following is defined: purposes, formation principles, indicators and criteria of the assessment system, rating scale, the procedure and order of assessment process of higher education institution’s administrative personnel personal performance. Criteria of an assessment of personal efficiency of employees of higher education institution are considered in case the employee significantly exceeds expectations (“image” of a perfect employee), exceeds expectations, meets expectations, needs an improvement and doesn’t meet expectations (“image” of the bad employee). The procedure of payments of the individual size of an award of the worker proceeding from the received assessment is shown.
Highlights
You must admit, that it is rather frequent for a well-known Reshetnikov’s picture “Opyat’ dvoika” (F-mark again) to come back to your memory when expecting the results or even the draft of an assessment procedure
As for the Russian higher education institutions, as a rule, mainly the academic staff (AS) is assessed regularly. It is obvious because it forms the core of a higher education institution, besides that, indicators and criteria of this assessment – no matter how you treat them–are generally developed by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (MESRF) within annual monitoring of efficiency of higher education institutions
Results of sociological researches of personnel capacity of the higher school were considered depending on various type of motivation and ways of stimulation of workers, scientific and methodical providing an assessment of their activity, development on estimates of efficiency of staff of average educational institutions of Russia, in particular school No 1497
Summary
That it is rather frequent for a well-known Reshetnikov’s picture “Opyat’ dvoika” (F-mark again) to come back to your memory when expecting the results or even the draft of an assessment procedure. As for the Russian higher education institutions, as a rule, mainly the academic staff (AS) is assessed regularly. It is obvious because it forms the core of a higher education institution, besides that, indicators and criteria of this assessment – no matter how you treat them–are generally developed by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (MESRF) within annual monitoring of efficiency of higher education institutions. The great interest is represented by researches Kibanova (2013) in this area, and the innovative methods of an assessment of quality of professional activity of pedagogical shots of the higher school developed under the leadership of Urzha The great interest is represented by researches Kibanova (2013) in this area, and the innovative methods of an assessment of quality of professional activity of pedagogical shots of the higher school developed under the leadership of Urzha (Urzha et al, 2009, pp. 78-125)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
