Abstract
Matrix-gaming experiments on cooperation have typically structured some conflict between persons' outcomes whereas most reinforcement studies of cooperation have not. In two laboratory experiments, reinforcement principles were applied to the question of how cooperative social exchange can be established when persons' outcomes are negatively correlated and social exchange must consist of alternating behaviors and rewards. Two variables are manipulated in the first experiment: the presence or absence of direct reinforcement for alternating, and the presence or absence of information of the other person's reinforcement. Both variables effectively established social exchange but even in their absence, half of the dyads still learned to exchange by performing response patterns that provided contingency information to the other person. These results may hold only for very simple operants, however. When a two-response sequence was required for reinforcement in the second experiment, neither information of the other person's reinforcement nor particular response patterns provided sufficient cues for the dyads to learn to exchange.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.