Abstract

This study is aimed at finding out (1) whether Lexical Diversity (LD) and Lexical Sophistication (LS) can provide useful insights into the development of academic writing by tracing the interaction between the intra-individual variability in relation to a Dynamic Systems perspective, and (2) whether the supportive interaction between LD and LS can be recognized from the writing development. Twelve academic writing samples written over a 5-year period (2010-2015) by an Indonesian learner of English were employed as longitudinal data. Several tools designed by van Geert and van Dijk (2002), Peltier (2009), and Steinkrauss (2016) were used to analyze the dynamic patterns of language development. The results showed that the development of intra-individual variability in academic writing is in line with the Dynamic Systems Theory as it indicates that the developmental process between the two growers is complex, non-linear, self-organized, unpredictable, revealing attractor states, and constantly changing. The supportive growth movement emerges as the result of the interaction between variables. Finally, it can be concluded that variability is a source of development. Learners might need to be aware of their unique learning trajectory in order to maintain a more stable linguistic development.

Highlights

  • The Dynamic System Theory (DST) posits that the presence of variability is a source of development, from which one’s language processing is seen as a non-linear, complex, individual, and dynamic trajectory (Lowie, 2013)

  • Looking at the line-graph in Figure 1, there were some moments of progress and regress in the development of Vocabulary Diversity (VocD), in which Text 12 had the highest peak, whereas the lowest trough was showed in Text 6

  • This study aims at addressing whether intra-individual variability of Lexical Diversity (LD), in this case, Vocabulary Diversity (VocD), and Lexical Sophistication (LS), Average Word Length in Morphemes (AWLiM), can provide important insights on language development

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Dynamic System Theory (DST) posits that the presence of variability is a source of development, from which one’s language processing is seen as a non-linear, complex, individual, and dynamic trajectory (Lowie, 2013). Showing the peaks and troughs within the process is one of the normal characteristics of the system (de Bot et al, 2005). Those moments of progress and regress are surely unavoidable in accordance with the assumption of the dynamic interaction of subsystems in the developmental data. This research aims to give worthwhile insights whether (1) LD and LS can provide useful insights into the development of academic writing by investigating the interaction between the intra-individual variability in relation to a Dynamic Systems perspective, and (2) whether the supportive interaction between LD and LS can be recognized from the writing development

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call