Abstract

While several Dutch academics consider the development of ecological corridors in the Netherlands a duty under the Birds and/or the Habitats Directive, other academics and the Dutch government consider them as being measures going further than required by Union law, alias gold plating. In 2010, the Dutch government blocked the development of these corridors. On the basis of the analysis of the Habitats Directive’s preliminary documents and the case law of the CJEU, this Article concludes that, generally, the development of ecological corridors is not an obligation. However, if not developing them seriously compromises the achievement of the goals pursued by the Union legislator, there is a duty to develop them. Furthermore, although in most of the cases their development is not an obligation, it can be argued that, in the light of the principle of sincere cooperation, the Member States have to perform a case-by-case assessment of whether the competence to develop ecological corridors should be exercised.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call