Abstract

Estrogens in the brain are critical in the protection of neural pathways, and in the enhancement of hippocampal memory consolidation. The estrogen receptor exists in two forms: alpha (ERα) and beta (ERβ), the latter of which is predominant in the hippocampus and a drug target for several cognitive disorders. Thus, we have developed a selective ERβ agonist to combat memory decline in post‐menopausal women affected by significantly lowered estrogen levels.The molecule reported is an A‐C estrogen that shows high potency and selectivity for ERβ. ERα agonist activity has been linked to increased risk of diseases such as breast cancer and stroke, among others. Selectivity for ERβ over ERα is therefore critical in the success of a drug molecule that acts like estrogen. TR‐FRET displacement assays were utilized to determine the most promising candidates from a library of lead molecules by detecting binding of the molecules to the ERβ ligand binding domain. ISP358‐2 was one of few potent molecules that displayed an EC50 < 30 nM, and also showed a 12‐fold selectivity of ERβ (EC50 = 24 ± 5 nM) over ERα (EC50 = 289 ± 92 nM). ERβ cell‐based assays further confirmed the molecule's potency, and ERα cell‐based potency showed ERβ selectivity. To verify our cell‐based assay results, ISP358‐2 was tested for selectivity in seven other nuclear hormone receptors in cell‐based assays. We saw no significant activity in any nuclear hormone receptor other than the estrogen receptor.We hypothesized that the selectivity observed was due to selective coactivator recruitment present only in the native full length ERβ. This hypothesis was supported by data obtained from the cell‐based transcriptional activation assay, which employs a full length and native estrogen receptor and most closely mimic the in vivo situation. The results obtained in this assay were profound in that ISP358‐2 showed an ERβ agonist potency of 31 ± 7 nm, and an ERα agonist potency of 20,400 ± 859 nM. This equates to a selectivity of ERβ of ~750 fold over ERα. These results suggest that the coactivator plays a role in the selectivity of ISP358‐2. In a TR‐FRET coactivator binding assay the results showed a 15 fold selectivity for ERβ (EC50 =191 ± 15 nM) over ERα (EC50 =2,940 ± 390 nM). However, the coactivator assay utilizes a PPARɣ derived peptide. Using docking studies, we showed that the brain‐relevant SRC‐1 peptide docks more favorably. Modeling studies also demonstrate that the conformational change is favorable for coactivator recruitment for ERβ when agonist ISP358‐2 is bound, but not for the agonist‐bound ERα.Support or Funding InformationThis work was supported by NIH grants R15GM118304 and R01DA038042.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.