Abstract

BackgroundResearch funders expect evidence of end user engagement and impact plans in research proposals. Drawing upon existing frameworks, we developed audit criteria to help researchers and their institutions assess the knowledge exchange plans of health research proposals.FindingsCriteria clustered around five themes: problem definition; involvement of research users; public and patient engagement; dissemination and implementation; and planning, management and evaluation of knowledge exchange. We applied these to a sample of grant applications from one research institution in the United Kingdom to demonstrate feasibility.ConclusionOur criteria may be useful as a tool for researcher self-assessment and for research institutions to assess the quality of knowledge exchange plans and identify areas for systematic improvement.

Highlights

  • Research funders expect evidence of end user engagement and impact plans in research proposals

  • We developed criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans within research proposals that could be applied to a sample of grant proposals and fed back to researchers

  • We extracted candidate knowledge exchange principles and recommendations from a review and synthesis of knowledge exchange frameworks, supplemented by existing guidance issued by United Kingdom (UK) research councils [6,7,8,11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research funders expect evidence of end user engagement and impact plans in research proposals. If researchers have followed recent advice to embed knowledge exchange principles and mechanisms throughout the entire lifecycle of a research project [2,5], it may be relatively difficult for reviewers to directly comment on this aspect of a proposal. This situation offers little scope for researchers to learn about how knowledge exchange can be better incorporated into the research process. There is a risk that researchers will come to see knowledge exchange and impact plans as a ‘tick-box’ exercise rather than considering how these could genuinely improve the entire research project

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.