Abstract

SUMMARY: For the determination of Escherichia coli I in sea water lactose broth frequently gave higher presumptive and confirmed counts than MacConkey's broth. In the presumptive count there were 53 cases where lactose broth gave larger numbers than MacConkey's broth, with 11 equal counts, and only 25 cases with smaller counts (P=0·00137). After confirmation the corresponding numbers of cases were 39, 10 and 27 (P=0·134).In the samples giving most probable numbers (MPN) of less than 100 E. coli/100 ml lactose broth was superior to MacConkey's broth (P=0·021). At higher MPN values both media were satisfactory, but with highly polluted water MacConkey's broth might give better recoveries due to the suppression of high concentrations of non‐coli‐aerogenes bacteria.Samples stored for 24 or 48 hr before testing gave higher presumptive recoveries when examined with lactose broth than with MacConkey's broth, the values for P being 0·028 and 0·0027 respectively.It appears that lactose broth without inhibitory ingredients could be used with advantage in the examination of sea water.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.