Abstract

Due to land scarcity, agricultural land infertility, high population pressure and recurrent drought, the government of Ethiopia implemented resettlement programs in 2003 EC before 15 years. The program aimed at addressing the problem of drought and famine through improved access to land and availing institutional support. In light of this, the objective of the study is to identify existing livelihood strategies adopted by rural households and analyze factors that determine households’ participation to choose alternative livelihood strategies in Buno Bedele Zone, Chewaka resettlement district. The data were collected through both primary and secondary data collection methods. The data were obtained from 137 sample household heads that were selected through simple random sampling techniques. The study used both descriptive and econometrics for analysis. The descriptive statistics were used to explain socio economic characters of the household comparison which it resettlers have better encouragement than the hosts community,… and it was used to identify the existence of livelihood strategies that was 60.72 percent of households total annual income from the on farm strategy (agriculture) and 23.46/15.81percent was from off/nonfarm activities. Multinomial logit model applied to analyses the factors that determine households’ participation to choose alternative livelihood strategies. In this regard, the econometric investigation indicate that out of the total seventeen variables included in the models four variables in non and off farm activities, ten variables in off farm and on farm strategies, eight variables in combination of on farm, off farm and nonfarm activities and four variables in on farm and nonfarm activities were solely or simultaneously in different strategies significant including age of household heads, family size, dependent ratio, settlement fragmentation, number of oxen, irrigation access, education access, land size, livestock holding size, sex of household head,, market distance, total annual income from on farm, membership in local association, extension service, agricultural input use and credit access are found to be the significant determinants up to 10% probability levels. The results of this study recommend that resettlement implementation should be for sustainable livelihood development. To do so, higher concern would be given to the environmental issue and both agricultural intensification and non/off farm strategies could be strengthened to raise positively farmers’ participation in various livelihood strategy.

Highlights

  • The resettlement program has the potential to improve the food security situation and diversifying livelihood strategies if it is fully supported by government and other stakeholders

  • The objective of this study was analyzing the determinants of participation in various livelihood strategies of rural household the case of chewaka resettlement district

  • The findings of the study indicated that resettlement had positive effect on demographic features, encourage and creation of livelihood which intern had significant effect on determinants of participation in different livelihood strategies of rural household

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The resettlement program has the potential to improve the food security situation and diversifying livelihood strategies if it is fully supported by government and other stakeholders. Beneficiaries of Chewaka resettlement scheme were afforded larger and relatively productive landholdings resulting in them being able to produce more than in their area of origin, improving the food security situation of the majority of the resettled households. As the resettlement program has the potential to improve the livelihood and food security situation of settlers if it is fully supported by government and other stakeholders [50]. Despite there was conclusion by the researcher on the study area as the resettlement program have a positive effects for affect community to secure their, nothing is not reflected about the impact of resettlement on environment and the perception and effort of settlers (resettlers and host community) to conserve their environment. The focuses of this study are; what are their new livelihood creation and determinants of participation in the activities after resettlement? What encouragement is there on their socioeconomic level? And what are the resettlers and host perception and efforts to conserve the environment?

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call