Abstract
I use the new SEC disclosure rule of 2006 to examine the role of CEO inside debt (pension plans and deferred compensation plans) in CEO compensation problem. I find that the contribution ratio of deferred compensation to total cash compensation is positively related to firm size, firm liquidity status, firm default risk, and executive personal wealth. In addition, I find a non-linear relation between firm leverage and CEO inside debt. The investigation shows that the underlying reasons for this non-linear relation may relate to firm financial distress and CEO risk aversion. This finding suggests that inside debt plays a more complex role in mitigating the asset substitution problem.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
