Abstract
There are a number of theoretical approaches which have been applied to the determination of profits in the American aerospace industry. Carroll [5, p. 545] views the government sector as essentially a bilateral monopoly, suggesting that the profit outcome will be determined by the relative bargaining strengths of the participants. Scherer [14, p. 371] describes the process of contract negotiations and asserts that the outcome depends upon the relative bargaining power and skill the two parties bring into negotiations. Agapos and Dunlap [1] assert that the bilateral monopoly framework is not appropriate. Their analysis suggests that the profit outcome will depend (all other things being equal) on: a) how anxious a contractor is to participate in a program relative to how anxious the government agency is to have the program executed,' and b) the relative qualities of the information available to each potential contractor and the government concerning the maximum concessions each party is willing to make. These approaches all suggest that the profit outcome is determined by the relative bargaining strengths (eagerness, informa-
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.