Abstract
We investigate the causes and consequences of changes in option-based compensation for the top five executives around the issuance of SFAS 123R, which requires firms to expense the fair value of their employee stock options (ESOs) on their income statements. We hypothesize that firms with greater tendencies to substitute ESOs for other forms of compensation to report higher earnings pre SFAS 123R cut back more on ESOs. Consistent with our hypotheses, we find that reduction in the proportion of total compensation paid in ESOs increased in the firm's propensity to take advantage of ESOs' favorable accounting as proxied by debt contracting concerns, tendency to achieve earnings benchmarks using ESOs' favorable accounting treatment, corporate governance weakness, and if the firm accelerated vesting of outstanding ESOs in response to SFAS 123R. We show that firms replaced ESOs with restricted stock post SFAS 123R, but the substitution was less than dollar for dollar. We also find that ESO cutbacks around the issuance of SFAS 123R reduced abnormal compensation without harming firms' operating performance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.