Abstract

The article presents so-called “derivational” theory of legal interpretation and analyzes its basic assumptions. The derivational theory of legal interpretation is still little known outside of Poland (in contrast to the clarificative theory which was popularized in many English-language publications by Jerzy Wróblewski). The article is divided into two parts. The first part is presenting the normative model of legal interpretation according to the derivational theory. In the second part, the basic assumptions and features of the theory are analysed in context of some other approaches to legal interpretation. The author argues that there are two levels (or aspects) of the derivational theory: local and universal. The local level of theory is related to the fact that it was designed for Polish legal system and legal culture. However, beyond its local features, the derivational theory is presenting strong theoretical framework and some significant universal ideas about legal interpretation. This creates universal level that can be called the “hard core” of the theory. The author characterizes the elements of this hard core, and in particular the most important element: the idea that the legal interpretation consists in the reconstruction of legal norms from legal provisions.

Highlights

  • Polish legal theory developed so-called “derivational” theory of legal interpretation which is normative theory1 offering holistic interpretive procedure

  • It needs to be highlighted that this approach is exactly the opposite of that accepted in the clarificative theory of legal interpretation

  • The derivational theory was designed for the Polish legal system and legal culture

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Polish legal theory developed so-called “derivational” theory of legal interpretation which is normative theory offering holistic interpretive procedure (set of interpretive directives). The derivational theory of legal interpretation was developed by. The derivational theory of legal interpretation is still little known outside of Poland (in contrast to Wróblewski’s clarificative theory of legal interpretation). One of the aims of this article is just to present it. The second one is to put it in the context of contemporary international (Englishlanguage) discussion about legal interpretation and discuss some crucial assumptions of the theory. The article is divided into two parts. The first part will present the process of legal interpretation according to the derivational theory. I will discuss the basic assumptions and features of the theory in relation to some well-known approaches to legal interpretation. This, in turn, will allow to point out the advantages of the discussed theory and its “hard-core”

Basics
The Arranging Phase of Interpretation
The Reconstruction Phase of Interpretation
The Perceptual Phase of Interpretation
Omnia Sunt Interpretanda
General Remarks
Is Interpretation Necessary?
Is It Possible to Have a Normative Theory of Legal Interpretation?
How Is It Possible to Have a Normative Theory of Legal Interpretation?
Intentionalism‐Textualism‐Purposivism‐Holism
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call