Abstract
As predicted, human Ss trained with three sizes of squares, intermediate size being “correct,” responded relationally to transposition tests regardless of similarity between training and test stimuli, providing sets (indexed by a task during training) were “relational”; but if sets were “absolute,” absolute responding was shown on similar tests, relational on dissimilar. Thus, had data from Ss with different sets been grouped, the resultant similarity function would represent no actual S. This new analysis appears fruitful in understanding findings not consistent with previous theoretical formulations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
