Abstract

In this paper we derive the density functions of R 2 and the ‘adjusted’ R 2 (say, R 2 ), and examine their risk performance under asymmetric loss when there are two types of misspecification. One is exclusion of relevant variables and the other is inclusion of irrelevant variables. It is shown numerically that both R 2 and R 2 tend to underestimate when there are omitted variables, and both R 2 and R 2 tend to overestimate when there are irrelevant variables. The risk dominance of R 2 over R 2 depends on whether or not overestimation is more serious than underestimation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.