Abstract

A literary text is both the product of, and a confrontation with, an historical conjuncture, as that conjuncture represents itself in ideology. This somewhat terse formulation is a useful one because it sets the literary critic an important and difficult task, the task of identifying in the text he examines those elements which are ‘reflective’ of the conjuncture which shaped it, and those elements which stand over against the conjuncture, that make the text discontinuous with, subversive of, the situation that called it into being. And as, of course, these different aspects of the text—its character as historical product and as political activity—are not empirically distinct elements of the text at all, but are, on the contrary, the contradictory ‘quality’ of the whole text, this gnomic but dialectical formulation forces the critic to examine methods by which the text in its determinate specificity nonetheless distantiates itself from its ideological locale. The three major novels of the first period of Solzhenitsyn’s development—One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, The First Circle and Cancer Ward—display certain similarities, and a certain evolution of aesthetic form. This internal history is the key to their ideological significance, to their ability to evaluate their own founding ideologies.KeywordsPositive BeliefNegative CentreEthical IdeologyIdeological OrientationFormal ArrangementThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call