Abstract

This paper investigates why large public companies in the UK purchase liability insurance for their directors and officers (D&O). Previous research suggests that companies may purchase D&O insurance for three reasons: (1) as part of their corporate insurance programme, (2) due to demand from directors, and (3) as part of an optimal governance arrangement. This study tests each of these hypotheses on a sample of large UK companies. The empirical analysis is facilitated by UK legislation obliging companies to disclose the existence of a corporate-funded D&O policy. The empirical analysis finds that insured companies are larger, are more exposed to US litigation, experience greater share price risk, exhibit lower levels of managerial ownership, and possess greater non-executive representation on their boards than uninsured companies. These findings provide some support for all three motivations for possessing D&O insurance but the demands of individual directors and governance seem particularly important.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.