Abstract

We examine the determinants of households' and banks' choice of mortgage rate fixation periods (FP) in a low interest rate environment. The existing literature interprets equilibrium FP, often reduced to the choice between Fixed Rate Mortgages (FRM) and Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARM), as purely demand driven. Using a unique dataset with offers from multiple banks for each mortgage request, we are the first to explicitly disentangle demand and supply determinants of FP choices. We show that banks can advance their own FP preferences along several dimensions. Their desired FP must account both for the implied Interest Rate Risk (IRR), and for the Credit Risk implications from shifting that IRR to households. Our empirical results confirm that banks do indeed take into account both types of risk, although some margins of response are used only to small extent.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.