Abstract
David Hume is usually understood as an early modern champion of atheism, having exposed the absence of rational arguments for the existence of God and the presence of irrational factors in the formation of all religious belief. In this essay I intend to develop a more complex picture of Hume. At the beginning of the Natural History of Religion, Hume makes a distinction between genuine theism and vulgar religion. I will argue that Hume rejects the latter, but endorsees the former. To each of these two forms of religion Hume associates a certain model of the deity: one ascertained by the faculty of empirical reason, the other generated by passions deeply rooted in the anxieties of finitude. The model to which one is inclined will depend largely upon one’s ethical profile.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
