Abstract
Each real number x can be assigned a degree of unsolvability by using, for example, the degree of unsolvability of its binary or decimal expansion, or of its Dedekind cut, or of some other representation of x. We show that the degree of unsolvability assigned to x in any such way is the same regardless of the representation used. This gives to each real number a unique degree of unsolvability. If x is of computably enumerable degree, there is a computable sequence of rationals which converges to x with a modulus of convergence having the same degree of unsolvability as x itself. In contrast, if x is computable relative to the halting set but is not of computably enumerable degree, this is not true. Specifically, if r n is any computable sequence of rationals converging to such a real number x, the modulus of convergence of r n must have degree of unsolvability strictly higher than that of x. Thus there is an inherent gap between the degree of unsolvability of such an x and the degree of unsolvability of the modulus of convergence of an approximating computable sequence of rationals; this gap is bridged (in the sense of the “join operator” of degree theory) by a set of natural numbers which measures the twists and turns of the computable sequence r n.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.