Abstract

AbstractIt is hypothesized that ‘hydraulic vulnerability segmentation’ (the vulnerability of expendable organs is higher compared to the vulnerability of nonexpendable organs) can enhance the drought‐tolerance of trees. However, prediction of positive segmentation (leaf minus branch) did not gain undisputed support in field observations. Further, the main organs of trees (leaf/trunk/root) are vital to test the hypothesis at the individual level. Unfortunately, most verifications of the hypothesis focus on the hydraulic vulnerabilities between leaves and terminal branches of mature trees. In this study, we grew three deciduous oak (Quercus mongolica, Q. variabilis and Q. aliena) seedlings (6 months old), and measured the hydraulic vulnerabilities of leaves (by rehydration method), main stems and main roots (by bench dehydration method). The sensitivity of stomata to water potential was obtained by monitoring the stomata conductance response to drought stress. The xylem anatomy of main stem and main root was also measured. It was found that the leaves of all three oak species exhibited greater vulnerability than the main stems and main roots. The leaf‐stem segmentation was more pronounced than the stem‐root one, and the stem‐root in Q. aliena even showed a reversed segmentation. Further, we found that higher stomatal sensitivity was associated with higher P50,leaf (water potential at 50% loss of leaf hydraulic conductivity), and narrower segmentation between leaf and the most embolism‐resistant organ. Collectively, our results support the ‘hydraulic vulnerability segmentation’ hypothesis at the individual level, and highlight the importance of stomatal regulation in hydraulic vulnerability segmentation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call