Abstract
A comparison is made between the deformation-induced zone beneath nanoindentations obtained by Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Since there are resolutional limitations associated with EBSD, especially at very small scan sizes, it is not known how accurately the deformed volume beneath the imprints can be characterized. To aid in answering this question, cross-sectional EBSD and TEM samples of nanoindentations were fabricated by means of a Focused Ion Beam (FIB) workstation, analyzed, and subsequently compared with each other. For large indentations as well as for shallow ones, agreement of the determined zones was found. The results of the EBSD and TEM experiments were also used to characterize the deformed volumes. In the EBSD maps of large indentations, strongly confined deformation patterns were found, while for the shallow indentations the observed patterns are more diffuse. The TEM micrographs and the Selected-Area Electron Diffraction (SAED) support these facts and give insight into the dislocation structure of the deformation zone.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
