Abstract
This article traces the history of the insanity defense and reviews the controversies surrounding it. It compares the “wild beast test” introduced by Justice Tracy in 1723 with the criterion proposed by the Reagan administration following the attempted assassination of the president by John Hinckley. It assesses the role of the psychiatrist as an expert witness and that of the jury in defense-of-insanity trials, and reviews the press that both received following the Hinckley trial and jury verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
