Abstract

Between 1941 and 1992, the Columbus Typographical Union's grievance procedure underwent a change from a cooperative, union- controlled system with peer review as an important core feature, to one that became more adversarial and typical of industrial union procedures. Key factors outside the immediate employment rela tionship were largely responsible: the industrialization of Colum bus, federal labor policy, technological changes, industry restruc turing, and general changes in printing industry labor relations practices. Few unions had as much shopfloor power as the typogra phers ; few union members enjoyed more democratic rights in the workplace. Despite this, the union suffered tremendous losses. Thus, for unions, this case study shows that cooperation with manage ment in unstable, changing social environments can be a very risky undertaking, especially if they do not pay proper attention to their larger environment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.