Abstract

We present results for the decay constants of the D and Ds mesons computed in lattice QCD with Nf = 2 + 1 dynamical flavours. The simulations are based on RBC/UKQCD’s domain wall ensembles with both physical and unphysical light-quark masses and lattice spacings in the range 0.11-0.07 fm. We employ the domain wall discretisation for all valence quarks.The results in the continuum limit are fD = 208.7(2.8)stat(− 1.8+ 2.1)sysMeV and {f}_{D_s}=246.4{(1.3)}_{mathrm{stat}}{left({}_{-1.9}^{+1.3}right)}_{mathrm{sys}}mathrm{M}mathrm{e}mathrm{V} and {f}_{D_s}={f}_D=1.667{(77)}_{mathrm{stat}}{left({}_{-43}^{+57}right)}_{mathrm{sys}} . Using these results in a Standard Model analysis we compute the predictions |Vcd| = 0.2185(50)exp(− 37+ 35)lat and |Vcs| = 1.011(16)exp(− 9+ 4)lat for the CKM matrix elements.

Highlights

  • We present results for the decay constants of the D and Ds mesons computed in lattice QCD with Nf = 2 + 1 dynamical flavours

  • The simulations are based on RBC/UKQCD’s domain wall ensembles with both physical and unphysical light-quark masses and lattice spacings in the range 0.11–0.07 fm

  • As we will see in section 3.2.2, the difference between treating them as mixed and non-mixed is numerically irrelevant. Two observations in this context which we made in our quenched Domain wall fermions (DWF) studies [34, 35] are crucial for understanding the choice of simulation parameters made here: studying the pseudoscalar heavy-heavy and strange-heavy decay constants we found cut-off effects to be minimal for M5 ≈ 1.6

Read more

Summary

Numerical simulations

This report centres mainly around ensembles with physical light-quark masses in large volumes [37]. As we will see in section 3.2.2, the difference between treating them as mixed and non-mixed is numerically irrelevant Two observations in this context which we made in our quenched DWF studies [34, 35] are crucial for understanding the choice of simulation parameters made here: studying the pseudoscalar heavy-heavy and strange-heavy decay constants we found cut-off effects to be minimal for M5 ≈ 1.6. That we allow for one exception to the bound amh ≤ 0.4 by generating data for amh = 0.45 on ensemble C0 With this we tested whether the reach in the heavy quark mass for DWF with M5 = 1.6 observed in the quenched theory [35] persists in the dynamical case. We exclude any data with amh > 0.4 in the remainder of this paper

Data analysis
Correlation functions
Non perturbative renormalisation
Unmixed action axial current renormalisation constants
Vertex functions of mixed action current
Strange-quark mass correction
Fixing the physical charm quark
Global fit
Global fit for ratio of decay constants
Global fit for ΦD and ΦDs
Systematic error analysis
CKM matrix elements
Conclusion and outlook
A Properties of ensemble F1
Findings
B Correlator fit results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call