Abstract
ABSTRACT In Britain ‘quality’ has been set alongside ‘value for money’ as a policy goal in higher education. The debate in the USA, by contrast, pairs ‘quality’ with ‘equity’, ‘equality’, or ‘access’. For the most part, the public debate in Britain has lacked two other elements that are conspicuous in the American one: discussion of curricular content (e.g. the nature of liberal education and the plight of the ‘humanities’) and references to hard evidence about either the decline or maintenance of standards. There is, of course, much common ground—e.g. the need for more good mathematicians and technologists. The principal reasons for the different forms the debate has taken are (broadly) political and structural. Nevertheless, the debate in each country can benefit from knowledge of the other's problems, practices, and principles.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.