Abstract
ABSTRACT Since 2009, systematic interdisciplinary investigations on the Alpena-Amberley Ridge in Lake Huron have documented hunting features, stone tools and debitage, and unique paleoenvironmental data reported in numerous peer-reviewed publications. Andrew A. White presents a contrarian critique of this work that attempts to dismiss each find and hypothesis that has been generated by the research. White’s assertions rely on a cherry-picked reading of the literature, outdated typological analogies and paleoenvironmental models, and are rife with contradictions. Yet White is unable to present a convincing or coherent counter-scenario to account for the Lake Huron data. This critique aptly illustrates that there is still much research to be done in the Great Lakes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
