Abstract

Samsung has been implicitly linked to human rights abuses and wider social downgrading propagated within the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Reports by different studies have shown artisanal cobalt mines (ASM) to exploit child labour and subject workers to perilous conditions. The IT multinational is dependent upon Congolese cobalt as a key element in lithiumion batteries used to produce their array of electronics. However, irresponsible cobalt sourcing practices undertaken by Tier 1 suppliers, Glencore and Huayou, have resulted in ASM operations being incorporated into Samsung’s global value chain, as Tier 2 suppliers. Analysis of the relationships underpinning Samsung’s cobalt value chain theoretical framework, highlights the presence of a relational governance structure, with captive elements among upstream Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers. Samsung is thereby reliant upon both Glencore and Huayou to transmit and enforce private codes of conduct down the value chain to expel human rights abuses. In conjunction, the DRC’s weak and unstable institutional environment has facilitated corruption and the improper enforcement of laws across the ASM industry. It is thereby imperative that Samsung takes ownership of the issues present within its value chain, as both Tier 1 suppliers and the Congolese government have failed to ensure responsible cobalt sourcing practices to date. This report recommends that Samsung adopt a holistic action plan, not only utilising their own resources and capabilities, but also those of critical stakeholders including Tier 1 suppliers, NGOs and the DRC and South Korean governments. Most prominently, this report suggests that supply chain transparency can be improved using certificates of origin and blockchain technology. Furthermore, it is recommended that poverty alleviation is targeted as a key measure through “Cobalt for Development”, an action plan designed to instigate both social and economic upgrading within ASM operations and the wider community. By employing a multi-scalar approach and addressing the issues inherent across multiple governance levels, Samsung can ensure a responsible source of cobalt be sustained.

Highlights

  • The demand for Cobalt is at an all-time high as it is a critical component for lithium-ion batteries and a component of products such as mobile phones and electric vehicles

  • Samsung has been implicitly linked to human rights abuses and wider social downgrading propagated within the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)

  • The IT multinational is dependent upon Congolese cobalt as a key element in lithium-ion batteries used to produce their array of electronics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The demand for Cobalt is at an all-time high as it is a critical component for lithium-ion batteries and a component of products such as mobile phones and electric vehicles. In 2016 and 2017 Amnesty International (Amnesty) issued two reports that disclosed mining conditions in the DRC and confronted companies with the fact that they are sourcing materials from artisanal mines, thereby enabling child labour and other hazardous business practices in their supply chain (Amnesty International, 2016, 2017) One of these companies was Samsung Electronics, resulting in devastating public press Samsung relies on key Cobalt suppliers in the DRC and tries to establish responsible standards in their supply chain through business partners They are currently not implementing sufficient recommended measures that are responsible for eliminating child labour and improving the working conditions in Congolese artisanal mines

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.