Abstract
The Ciceronian maxim salus populi, suprema lex was regularly invoked by writers justifying Parliament's war against Charles I. Quentin Skinner has seen this axiom as integral to the notion of ‘neo‐Roman’ liberty. However, as Johann Sommerville has recently demonstrated, in both early modern and classical contexts, salus populi was often used to justify the ‘arbitrary’ power of the sovereign. This essay traces the implications of one absolutist reading of this classical tag in Robert Sanderson's ‘Case of the Liturgy’: a case of conscience justifying amending the church liturgy in order to conform to the requirements of the Parliament's Directory (1645). The posthumous publication of Sanderson's case in the Restoration period reveals the ambiguity of this axiom, which was used, via Sanderson, to justify both the dispensing and suspending power of James II and giving obedience to William and Mary in the wake of the Revolution of 1688–9.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
