Abstract

The spider mite Tetranychus urticae is a major agricultural pest with a global distribution, extremely diverse host range and a remarkable ability to develop resistance to a wide variety of acaricides. P450 mono‐oxygenases have been frequently associated with resistance development in this species. In particular enzymes of the CYP392A-subfamily were shown to metabolize a number of key acaricides, including abamectin, amitraz, fenpyroximate and the active metabolite of pyflubumide. However, transcriptomic studies comparing highly resistant and susceptible populations have often revealed high expression of members of the CYP392D-subfamily, but these have been only poorly studied. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of gene expression data of 20 populations and identified two key enzymes of this family, CYP392D2 and CYP392D8, whose expression is associated with resistance. We subsequently functionally expressed these enzymes, together with CYP392A11 and CYP392A16 as known metabolizers, and compared their potential to accept a wide diversity of acaricides as substrate. This study overall confirms previous discovered substrates for CYP392A11 and CYP392A16, but also reveals unreported metabolic activity towards new acaricides. These include carbaryl, chlorpyrifos and etoxazole for CYP392A16 and carbaryl, chlorpyrifos and NNI-0711-NH pyflubumide for CYP392A11. For the newly studied CYP392D-family, we show that CYP392D2 metabolizes pyridaben, fenpyroximate, etoxazole and chlorpyrifos, while CYP392D8 metabolizes carbaryl, fenazaquin and tebufenpyrad. Last, we observed that both CYP392A- and CYP392D-subfamily enzymes activate chlorpyrifos to its corresponding oxon. Our study indicates that there is both overlap and specificity in the activity of A- and D-subfamily enzymes against acaricides and model substrates. With the recent advent of highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing protocols in T. urticae, the way is now paved to conduct further genetic experiments revealing and quantifying the role of these enzymes in the resistance phenotype in field populations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.