The Current Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Management of HER2-Positive, Triple-Negative, and Micropapillary Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Abstract

Currently, the prevailing approach for managing breast carcinoma involves initiating neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) as a part of the treatment regimenbefore surgery.NACis being applied progressivelyin the therapeutic management of locally advanced breast carcinoma because of its capability to aid insurgery and facilitate the surgical treatment of patients who were once thought to be inoperable. Patients must be managed by a team of professionals from the start to thecompletion of the therapy. Pathological complete response (pCR), reduces the degree of recurrence of the disease and denotes the elimination of the tumor completely from the breast, it also indicates elimination of the tumor from theaxillary lymph nodes. There is currently sufficient information to support the idea that patients would perform better if NAC resulted in a pCR. The administration of the same regimen of adjuvant therapy in neoadjuvant therapy provides women with similar improvements in overall survival. NAC offers potential benefits, such as enhancing the likelihood of breast conservation and broadening the scope of available surgical options. Based on how well they respond to neoadjuvant treatment, women receive a personalized prognosis evaluation.NAC has been proven to be very effective. However, patients can be resistant to medications easily which is not desirable for patients receiving this therapy going forward. In this review, we have discussed the purpose of managing patients with this therapy in locally advanced breast cancer. We have also discussed the various benefits of NAC as well as the application of different drugs,their advantages, and disadvantages that are given to the patient. The application of NAC in cases ofhuman epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer and micropapillary breast cancer has also been discussed briefly in this review.