Abstract
The story of Mary Hylas offers a rare opportunity to examine a point of contact between metropolitan reformers and an Afro-Caribbean woman. Archival records related to the obscure case of Hylas v. Newton, heard in 1768, as well as the much more famous case of Somerset v. Stewart, heard in 1772, reveal how metropolitan reformers contended with slavery and marriage during the early years of political abolitionism in the British empire, and particularly how they attempted to contain their reforming rhetoric in order to condone marriage while condemning slavery. The records of Newton plantation, meanwhile, offer a window to the lived experiences of Mary Hylas. Life-long marriage was an unattainable and even undesirable ideal for many Afro-Caribbean women, Mary included.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
