Abstract

Design thinking has been adopted widely as a tool for innovation by companies and other organizations. However, statements by researchers and practitioners about what design thinking is are often seemingly conflicting with each other. This paper aims to improve our understanding of what design thinking for innovation is and under which conditions it can be implemented successfully. It discusses design thinking for innovation in the broader perspective of organizational culture. A framework of nine innovation culture dilemmas or ‘tensions’ is used as an organizing device to analyse the existing literature on design thinking for innovation and accounts of using design thinking for innovation in practice. It is argued that the power of design thinking is in the tension between seemingly opposite ways of thinking, such as analytic thinking versus intuitive thinking, and linear thinking versus thinking in iterative processes. For design thinking to flourish, it needs to be embedded in an organizational culture capable of maintaining a dynamic balance on a number of fundamental tensions in innovation processes. It is shown that the innovation dilemmas framework can be used as an analytical tool to evaluate to what extent organizations are equipped to benefit from design thinking for innovation.

Highlights

  • Design thinking has been adopted by companies, higher education institutes and governments as an approach to innovation

  • This paper explores under which conditions design thinking for innovation contributes to a culture of innovation and explores the challenges in developing cultures conducive to design thinking for innovation, by relating an analysis of the academic literature on design thinking for innovation to accounts of design thinking for innovation in practice

  • The dilemma approach of innovation cultures (Prud’homme van Reine & Dankbaar, 2009), seems to be a promising approach to understand the challenges in developing cultures conducive to design thinking for innovation, because it acknowledges complexity and multiple perspectives, and offers a method for handling tensions by balancing or ‘reconciling’ the dilemmas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

These organizational culture dilemmas show up as ‘innovation dilemmas’ in innovation processes as well (Prud’homme van Reine & Dankbaar, 2009; Trompenaars & Hampden-Turner, 2010; Prud’homme van Reine, 2015). It is expected that the tensions behind these dilemmas will show up in design thinking for innovation, as indicated in table 1. Each of the tensions will be discussed in detail in the sections 3.2 – 3.10. Organizational culture Expected tensions in design thinking for dilemmas innovation (derived from innovation culture (Trompenaars & Prud’homme van Reine, 2004). Dilemmas discussed in Prud’homme van Reine & Dankbaar, 2009; Prud’homme van Reine, 2015)

Research approach
Analytic thinking versus intuitive and creative thinking
Product push versus User empathy
Focus on functional aspects versus focus on aesthetic and emotional aspects
Closed versus open approaches to innovation
Innovation as a structured process versus ‘bricolage’
Individual creativity versus group collaboration
Leading design thinking: egalitarian versus hierarchical leadership
3.10 Short term versus long term approach to innovation
3.11 Design thinking for innovation as balancing contradictory elements
Design thinking as a strategic tool for innovation: cultural challenges
Discussion: cultures conducive to design thinking for innovation
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call