Abstract

AbstractSafely managed waste reuse may be a sustainable way to protect human health and livelihoods in agrarian-based countries without adequate sewerage. The safe recovery and reuse of fecal sludge-derived fertilizer (FSF) has become an important policy discussion in low-income economies as a way to manage urban sanitation to benefit peri-urban agriculture. But what drives the user acceptance of composted fecal sludge? We develop a preference-ranking model to understand the attributes of FSF that contribute to its acceptance in Karnataka, India. We use this traditionally economic modeling method to uncover cultural practices and power disparities underlying the waste economy. We model farmowners and farmworkers separately, as the choice to use FSF as an employer versus as an employee is fundamentally different. We find that farmers who are willing to use FSF prefer to conceal its origins from their workers and from their own caste group. This is particularly the case for caste-adhering, vegetarian farmowners. We find that workers are open to using FSF if its attributes resemble cow manure, which they are comfortable handling. The waste economy in rural India remains shaped by caste hierarchies and practices, but these remain unacknowledged in policies promoting sustainable ‘business’ models for safe reuse. Current efforts under consideration toward formalizing the reuse sector should explicitly acknowledge caste practices in the waste economy, or they may perpetuate the size and scope of the caste-based informal sector.

Highlights

  • Safe fecal sludge (FS) management is a necessity for 1.8 billion people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) that depend on septic tanks and pits for their sanitation needs (Berendes et al )

  • Farmers in villages adjacent to Dharwad recounted stories of how, in the past, lower-caste workers collected human excreta from households, hauled it away, and co-composted human waste and other organic waste into the manure commonly known as bhangi gobbara

  • This paper contributes to the understanding of the social and cultural drivers of latent demand for FS fertilizer (FSF) and what are considered more or less desirable attributes of FSF, in order to explore the risks of scalingup reuse within the current hierarchies of caste

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Safe fecal sludge (FS) management is a necessity for 1.8 billion people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) that depend on septic tanks and pits for their sanitation needs (Berendes et al ) These systems accumulate FS, which needs to be collected, transported, treated, and disposed of safely. As manual emptying has declined as a practice, urban pits and septic tanks are increasingly serviced by vacuum trucks attached to a pump and hose (Van Dijk et al ; O’Keefe et al ; Sharada Prasad & Ray ) These trucks look for places where the sludge can be quickly offloaded, legally or illegally, with the goal of optimizing the number of loads and revenues. They have become a new pathway for the old practice of moving human waste from the cities to farmlands to be used as fertilizer

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call