Abstract

AbstractThe crystal and molecular structures of four complexes of the general formula Ni(S2COR)2and two with the general formula Ni(S2CNR2)2have been determined. The brown crystals of [Ni(S2COMe)2], investigated at 293 K, are monoclinic, space groupP21/cwith unit cell dimensionsa= 6.357(4) Å,b= 13.755(10) Å,c= 10.566(3) Å,β= 97.20(3)°,Z= 4 andDx= 1.979 Mg m−3. The brown crystals of [Ni(S2COiBu)2], (293 K) are triclinic, space groupP{unk] with unit cell dimensionsa= 8.224(7) Å,b= 8.722(3) Å,c= 6.139(4) Å,α= 98.99(4)°,β= 105.36(5)°,γ= 109.10(4)°,Z= 1 andDx= 1.534 Mg m−3. Crystals of brown [Ni(S2COHex)2], (200 K) are triclinic, space groupP[unk] with unit cell dimensionsa= 7.566(2) Å,b= 10.713(4) Å,c= 6.779(2) Å,α= 97.73(3)°,β= 111.22(2)°,γ= 103.19(2)°,Z= 1 andDx= 1.417 Mg m−3. Crystals of brown [Ni(S2COCy)2], (200 K) are triclinic, space groupP[unk] with unit cell dimensionsa= 9.89(1) Å,b= 10.102(7) Å,c= 9.850(7) Å,α= 110.83(5)°, β= 107.19(7)°,γ= 87.28(9)°,Z= 2 andDx= 1.550 Mg m−3. Crystals of brown [Ni(S2CNCy2)2], (200 K) are triclinic, space groupP[unk] with unit cell dimensionsa= 11.551(5) Å,b= 14.651 (7) Å,c= 9.872(5) Å,α= 102.46(5)°,β= 114.78(3)°,γ= 89.65(4)°,Z= 2 andDx= 1.287 Mg m−3. The colorless crystals of [Ni(S2CN(Et)Cy)2] (200 K) are monoclinic, space groupP21/cwith unit cell dimensionsa= 8.534(4) Å,b= 12.087(4) Å,c= 11.109(4) Å,β= 95.54(3)°,Z= 2 andDx= 1.349 Mg m−3. The structures were solved by direct methods and each refined by a full-matrix least-squares procedure to finalR= 0.047 using 1149 reflections for [Ni(S2COMe)2]; toR= 0.040 using 1239 reflections for [Ni(S2COiBu)2]; toR= 0.050 using 1664 reflections for [Ni(S2COHex)2]; to finalR= 0.035 for 2956 reflections for [Ni(S2COCy)2]; to finalR= 0.055 for 3468 reflections for [Ni(S2CNCy2)2]; and to finalR= 0.031 for 1827 reflections for [Ni(S2CN(Et)Cy)2]. A systematic evaluation of the coordination geometries in these and related complexes indicate that there is little variation in the Ni-atom geometries which are invariably square planar, defined by a S4donor set. Further, there is no apparent systematic variation in the Ni–S bond distances that can be correlated with the nature of the individual xanthate (−S2COR) and dithiocarbamate C(−S2CNR2) ligands as moderated by the electronic/steric profiles of R. Rather, variations in the Ni–S bond distances are ascribed to i) intramolecular interactions between the sulfur atoms and the R substituents and, ii) intermolecular forces.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call